USPTO serial 76566917
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shannon, County Clare, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C.P.O. Box 1404Alexandria, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic patient and apparatus identification band and label readers and recorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus for extracting blood from a patient, treating it, and returning it to the patient by injections, for immune modulation therapy; medical unit which treats blood by exposing it to oxidative stress and ultraviolet light; accessories for use with such a medical unit, namely, blood extracting needles and syringes, blood return needles and syringes, containers in which the blood is stored and treated under sealed conditions, patient identifying bands and identifying bands and labels for medical apparatus; blood sample management kits comprising or consisting of blood extracting needles and syringes, blood return needles and syringes, syringe holders and transporters, blood treatment containers, collapsible blood bags, combined and interconnected syringe holders and collapsible blood treatment bags, syringe caps, patient identification bands, identification bands and labels for medical apparatus, blood sample controls, medical apparatus controls and patient and medical apparatus identification readers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services in the field of medical equipment, namely, apparatus for immune modulation therapy, blood extracting needles and syringes, blood return needles and syringes, containers in which the blood is stored and treated under sealed conditions, patient identifying bands, identifying bands and labels for medical apparatus, identification band and label readers and recorders, and blood sample management kits comprising or consisting of blood extracting needles and syringes, blood return needles and syringes, syringe holders and transporters, blood treatment containers, collapsible blood bags, combined and interconnected syringe holders and collapsible blood treatment bags, syringe caps, patient identification bands, identification bands and labels for medical apparatus, blood sample controls, medical apparatus controls and patient and medical apparatus identification readers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintaining medical equipment, namely, apparatus for immune modulation therapy | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely, the provision of immune modulation therapy; renting and leasing of medical equipment, namely, apparatus for immune modulation therapy | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |