CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WG

USPTO serial 76567186

WG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colin P. Abrahams

Colin P. Abrahams LAW OFFICES COLIN P. ABRAHAMSWARNER CENTER5850 CANOGA AVENUE, SUITE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financing services; financing loans for security and surveillance systemsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacturing of security and surveillance products, namely, inventory detection, control and tagging devices; devices for use in retail outlets on products to monitor and control inventory and unauthorized removalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 4, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance