USPTO serial 76567236
JOTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cong Ty Trach Nhiem Huu Han L.Q JOTON
Phu Nhuan District, Ho Chi Minh City, VN
Other trademarks owned by Cong Ty Trach Nhiem Huu Han L.Q JOTON
Cong Ty Trach Nhiem Huu Han L.Q JOTON
Phu Nhuan District, Ho Chi Minh City, VN
Other trademarks owned by Cong Ty Trach Nhiem Huu Han L.Q JOTON
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin J. Collette
KEVIN J COLLETTE RYAN SWANSON & CLEVELAND PLLC1201 3RD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Gloss enamel paints for exterior use, emulsion paints, namely, water-borne paints for use in civil constructions, and thickness and thinners for paints | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |