Drawing for NISC THE VISION TO SEE. THE POWER TO DO.

USPTO serial 76567292

NISC THE VISION TO SEE. THE POWER TO DO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NISC THE VISION TO SEE. THE POWER TO DO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Evans

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely an integrated enterprise system having billing modules, accounting modules and engineering modules used by rural electric and telecommunications cooperatives, and training manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—
035Business Services, namely data center services, namely, the processing, maintenance and management of data, for rural telecommunications cooperative not in the field of advertising agency and public relation services; business Services, namely management consulting for rural telecommunications cooperatives not in the field of advertising agency and public relation servicesACTIVE—
037Installation of computer hardware for rural electric and telecommunications cooperatives not in the field of advertising agency and public relation servicesACTIVE—
041Training in the field of computer hardware and software support for rural telecommunications cooperatives not in the field of advertising agency and public relation servicesACTIVE—
042Technical Support Services, namely hardware and software support in the nature of troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, network analysis, virtual private networks, wide area and local area network solutions for rural electric and telecommunications cooperatives not in the field of advertising agency and public relations services; computer services, namely, customer computer programming, for billing, accounting and/or engineering modules and applications, and to integrate and interface with third party software, for rural electric and telecommunications cooperatives not in the field of advertising agency and public relations services; computer services, namely, selection and integration of hardware and selection, integration and installation of software for rural telecommunications cooperatives not in the field of advertising agency and public relation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 22, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance