Drawing for UXOFAST

USPTO serial 76567397

UXOFAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UXOFAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

T. Daniel Christenbury

T DANIEL CHRISTENBURY IP DEPT OF PIPER RUDNICK LLP1650 MARKET ST STE 4900ONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE USE IN INFORMATION COLLECTION, UPDATING, AND MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance