USPTO serial 76567787
CO-OP BARNEYS NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CO-OP BARNEYS NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol L. B. Matthews
CAROL L B MATTHEWS ROBERT MLOTKOWSKI SAFRAN & COLE, P.C.7918 Jones Branch DriveSuite 500McLean, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's clothing, namely, vests; suits; skorts and culottes; and robes; lingerie; underwear; socks, tights, stockings; gloves, caps and scarves; men's clothing, namely, suits, raincoats, tuxedos, sport coats, sweatshirts, vests; slacks, dress shirts, underwear, pajamas, nightshirts, robes; ties and scarves; socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |