Drawing for PAX SYSTEM

USPTO serial 76567810

PAX SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROMAGHIM, PETER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAX SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fred W. Hathaway

FRED W HATHAWAY Dickinson Wright PLLC1825 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Lubricating gel used in a run-flat tire and vehicle wheel assemblyACTIVE—
007Machine tools used for the mounting and disassembly of run-flat tires and supports onto and from a vehicle wheelACTIVE—
008Hand tools, namely, tire levers and accessories for the mounting and disassembly of run-flat tires and supports onto and from vehicle wheels; Hand tools, namely, applicators for use in applying a lubricating gel in a run-flat tire and vehicle wheel assemblyACTIVE—
012Vehicle wheels, Tire and wheel accessories, namely, support rings which attach to a wheel and provide support to a run-flat tire when it is deflatedACTIVE—
020Tire and wheel shipping containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance