USPTO serial 76568102
EOVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EOVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
62217 BEAURAINS, FR
62217 Beaurains, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Surgical implants (living tissues), natural osseous substitutes, chemical osseous substitutes, bone grafts, anti-adhesion gel, anti-adhesion membrane, growth factor, ionic cement, bioactive coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical apparatus and instruments; orthopedic articles; prostheses, suture material; auxiliaries; intersomatic cages; bioresorbable cages; rachidian implants; rachidian osteosynthesis devices; cervical plates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |