USPTO serial 76568177
STORMWATER TREATMENT TRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STORMWATER TREATMENT TRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik W. Ibele
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design for others of stormwater management systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |