Drawing for BIG JIM

USPTO serial 76568268

BIG JIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG JIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey G. Sheldon

Jeffrey G. Sheldon Sheldon Mak Rose & Anderson PC100 East Corson Street, Third FloorPasadena, CA 91103-3842UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007POWER OPERATED GARDENING TOOLS, NAMELY, CLIPPERS, SHREDDERS, AND CULTIVATORSACTIVE—
008Gardening tools, namely, rakes, trowels, weeding forks, spades, and hoesACTIVE—
016BOOKS ABOUT GARDENING FOR ADULTSACTIVE—
020GARDEN FURNITURE, NAMELY, LAWN FURNITUREACTIVE—
021UTENSILS FOR BARBECUES, NAMELY, FORKS, TONGS, AND TURNERSACTIVE—
031LIVING HOUSE PLANTS, LIVING PLANTS FOR GARDENSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance