Drawing for BALTIMORE CRAB COMPANY

USPTO serial 76568461

BALTIMORE CRAB COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALTIMORE CRAB COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CRABMEAT, FISH, AND SEAFOODACTIVEMay 27, 2003
035WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FEATURING FISH AND SEAFOODACTIVEMay 27, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 22, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 7, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 27, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 27, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance