USPTO serial 76568638
BABY YOU'RE NO GOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY YOU'RE NO GOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Addison K. Adams
Addison K. Adams Richardson & Patel LLPSuite 50010900 Wilshire Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Series of pre-recorded videotapes, OD-ROMs and DVDs featuring proprietary comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation television shows and celebrity news | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a non-fiction television series featuring entertainment and celebrity news; providing entertainment and non-fiction information on topics related to a television program via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NGTV
- Other trademarks owned by Gene Simmons Company
- Other trademarks owned by NGTV, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BABY YOU'RE NO GOOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |