USPTO serial 76568777
ENERGY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3455883Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENERGY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristofer E. Halvorson
KRISTOFER E. HALVORSON THE HALVORSON LAW FIRM, P.C.1757 E Baseline Road, Suite 130Gilbert, AZ 85233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for managing building energy power systems, namely, lighting and electricity; computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for monitoring and controlling light levels, voltage and electric power consumption, through on-line access via computer and communications networks; computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for automated electronic building power management, namely, monitoring and controlling voltage and electric power consumption; computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for automated electronic lighting power management, namely, monitoring and controlling light levels, voltage and electric power consumption; computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for automated electrical transmission and interconnection, namely, monitoring and controlling voltage and electric power consumption; computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for automated electronic multi-level lighting power management; computers, servers, computer software and control boxes for automated electronic bi-level power management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |