Drawing for CORTIVA THERAPY

USPTO serial 76568841

CORTIVA THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORTIVA THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT M. KAREFF

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Personal care products, namely, body lotions, body creams, body oils and body moisturizers; bath products, namely gels, bath oils, salts, bubble baths, soaps and powders; skin care products, namely, cleansers, toners, moisturizers, scrubs and masks; sun care products, namely, sun block and sunscreen; lip care products, namely, lip balm and lip gel; eye care products, namely, eye cream; hair care products, namely, shampoos and conditioners; aroma therapy products, namely, essential oils, gels, lotions, creams, candles and incense; and massage products, namely, massage oils, massage creams, massage lotions and massage gels.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 22, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 21, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance