Drawing for E FORCE

USPTO serial 76568885

E FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger P. Furey

Roger P. Furey Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPSuite 700 - East Lobby1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST. N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing training and instruction for others in the field of providing support for DC power and battery equipment, and in the field of providing preventive maintenance and service in support of DC power and battery equipmentACTIVE—
042Providing technical support services for direct-current (DC) network power and network power battery products, namely, providing technical support for network power installations, network power engineering, network power audits and recommendations, network power equipment assembly and network power preventive maintenanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 27, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance