USPTO serial 76569020
GENTLE LIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENTLE LIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Welsh
JOHN L WELSH WELSH & FLAXMAN LLC2000 DUKE ST STE 100ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated lip balm | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |