USPTO serial 76569260
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
67657 Kaiserslautern, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Witherspoon
JEANENE L JOBST ESQ WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLC1201 W PEACHTREE ST STE 3500ONE ATLANTIC CTRATLANTA, GA 30309| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLE SEATS AND THEIR PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, VEHICLE SEAT FRAMES, VEHICLE SEAT CUSHIONS, VEHICLE SEAT COVERS, VEHICLE SEAT FASTENING DEVICES, VEHICLE SEAT LONGITUDINAL ADJUSTERS, VEHICLE SEAT HEIGHT ADJUSTERS, VEHICLE SEAT INCLINATION ADJUSTERS, BACKRESTS, BACKREST INCLINATION ADJUSTERS, VEHICLE SEAT LUMBAR SUPPORTS, VEHICLE SEAT HEADRESTS, PASSENGER RESTRAINTS FOR VEHICLE SEATS, AND SAFETY BELT SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |