USPTO serial 76569321
RITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN F.A. EARLEY III
JOHN F A EARLEY III HARDING EARLEY FOLLMER & FRAILEY PC86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE EAST1288 VALLEY FORGE ROAD PO BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cookware, namely, pots, pans, casserole dishes, and lids for pots, pans, and casserole dishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RITZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2013 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |