Drawing for HANDYCAM

USPTO serial 76569526

HANDYCAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANDYCAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video cameras; video tape recorders; video tape players; video disc recorders; video disc players; video cameras combined with video tape players and recorders; video cameras combined with video disc players and recorders; blank video tapes and discs; parts and fittings of the above mentioned goods, namely, rechargeable battery packs, AC adapters, shoulder straps, stereo AV photo cables, dry battery cases and wireless remote controlsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 22, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance