USPTO serial 76569551
YARD DAWGZ OKLAHOMA CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3265470Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with YARD DAWGZ OKLAHOMA CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
TULSA, OK
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Ko Craft; John L. Krieger; Robert B. Kouchoukos
Jennifer Ko Craft; John L. Krieger; Robert B. Kouc Dickinson Wright, PLLC8363 W. Sunset Road, Suite 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed annual media guides containing information about football, general merchandise catalogs, bumper stickers, writing pads and pens, pencils, trading cards, posters, paper pennants, post cards, calendars, paper stickers, appliqués in the form of decals, printed event admission tickets, greeting cards, statistical books, newsletters and pamphlets in the field of football for distribution to television and radio media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, player uniforms, namely footwear, jersey tops and pants; cheerleader uniforms; replica uniform shirts, coaches' caps, wool hats, painters' caps, baseball caps, visors, headbands, belts, t-shirts, tank tops, golf shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, leather jackets, neckties, coats, shorts, sweatpants, pants, socks and underwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 041 | Entertainment Services, namely organizing and presenting football games before live audiences and on television, radio, for global computer network display and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AF2 Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AF2 Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ARENA FOOTBALL ONE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AF2 Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named YARD DAWGZ OKLAHOMA CITY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |