CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHARK ATTACK MAN EATER PALE ALE HAVE A SHARK ATTACK!

USPTO serial 76569633

SHARK ATTACK MAN EATER PALE ALE HAVE A SHARK ATTACK!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHARK ATTACK MAN EATER PALE ALE HAVE A SHARK ATTACK!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

Thomas I. Rozsa Rozsa Law Group LC18757 Burbank BoulevardSuite 220Tarzana, CA 91356-3346

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BEER AND ALEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 15, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance