Drawing for BEAUX-TOPICAL

USPTO serial 76569635

BEAUX-TOPICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUX-TOPICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 26, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 26, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance