USPTO serial 76570322
PEAK PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEAK PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Peak Performance Production AB
S-102 53 Stockholm, SE
Peak Performance Production AB
S-102 53 Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |