Drawing for SOUNDCHECK

USPTO serial 76570324

SOUNDCHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUNDCHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Andrew McKinney, Jr.

J ANDREW MCKINNEY JR JONES, TULLAR & COOPER PCPO BOX 2266 EADS STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Quality control electro-acoustic performance testing equipment for use in a manufacturing environment, namely, computer hardware, microphones and computer software all for use in measuring audio transducer performance and electronic databases featuring quality control information on loudspeakers, microphones, telephones, hearing aids and audio systems recorded on computer softwareACTIVEJul 12, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 24, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 22, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 10, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 8, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance