USPTO serial 76570324
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Andrew McKinney, Jr.
J ANDREW MCKINNEY JR JONES, TULLAR & COOPER PCPO BOX 2266 EADS STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Quality control electro-acoustic performance testing equipment for use in a manufacturing environment, namely, computer hardware, microphones and computer software all for use in measuring audio transducer performance and electronic databases featuring quality control information on loudspeakers, microphones, telephones, hearing aids and audio systems recorded on computer software | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |