Drawing for WHEAT BERRY

USPTO serial 76570535

WHEAT BERRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3113202Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 4, 2006
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEAT BERRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Nieds

Mark A. Nieds IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cood Rd.Suite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043restaurant servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jan 27, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 27, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 25, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 30, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 30, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance