Drawing for RADIESSE M

USPTO serial 76570597

RADIESSE M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIESSE M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark H. Hellmann

Diane G. Elder Foley & Lardner LLP321 North Clark StreetChicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Cosmetic restoration and augmentation treatments, namely, biocompatible gel injections for use as treatment alternatives to plastic surgery and internal tissue augmentationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 23, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance