USPTO serial 76570773
DUPLICATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUPLICATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Byrne
STEVEN M AUVIL BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF L2300 BP TWR200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products; namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair spray, styling spray, styling gel, styling lotion, hair gloss, hair color and permanent waves; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin creams, cleansing lotions, sunscreens, moisturizers, body gel, hand soap, personal deodorants, toothpaste, non medicated mouth wash, face toner, eye makeup remover, spray gels, foaming bath cream, men's and women's shave gel, men's post shave, men's and women's shower gels, and facial scrubs; personal care products, namely, hand and body lotions, cleansing creams, night creams, make-up, hair coloring products, skin and hair bleaches, foot care products, namely, non medicated foot deodorant spray, non-medicated foot powder, foot lotions, foot scrubs, foot exfoliates; sun care products, namely, sunscreen, sunblock, sun tanning lotions, and after-tan lotions; spa products, namely, cleansing muds, sugar scrubs, eye cream, body butter, body milk, body polish, massage oil; body oils, exfoliates for skin; body refresher sprays; household chemical specialty products, namely, all-purpose household cleaning compounds, hard surface cleaners, bathroom cleaners, wall and floor cleaners, polishes and cleaners for metal, plastic, stainless steel, glass and ceramic surfaces, none of the foregoing for use on percussion or other musical instruments and not sold in music or musical instrument stores; laundry detergents, stain removers, adhesive removers, dishwashing detergents, dishwashing rinse aids, namely, dishwashing detergent rinses; pot and pan cleaners, shower, tub, tile and basin cleaners, laundry stain removers, fabric softeners; industrial chemical specialty products, namely, building maintenance chemicals for cleaning, floor wax removers, carpet cleaners, wall, floor and hard surface cleaners, cleaners for plastic, stainless steel, stone, tile, concrete and asphalt surfaces, floor finishes, glass and plastic window cleaners, laundry detergents, laundry stain removers, fabric softeners, dishwashing compounds, namely, dishwashing detergents and dishwashing soaps; pot and pan cleaners, degreasing preparations not used in manufacturing processes for use on hard surfaces; and vehicle washing and waxing compounds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nadeon, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OUTSOURCING SERVICES GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OUTSOURCING SERVICES GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DUPLICATES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |