USPTO serial 76570895
8 TRUSTSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 8 TRUSTSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Copabana, Rio de Janeiro, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brooks R. Bruneau
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PREVENTIVE AUDIT SOFTWARE, WHICH ALLOWS TO INVESTIGATE, DETECT AND CORRECT SECURITY FAILURES ON INTERNET SERVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |