Drawing for MASTER BLASTER

USPTO serial 76570911

MASTER BLASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTER BLASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman Zafman

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's, women's and children's apparel, namely, headwear, footwear,tops, bottoms, underwear, shirts, pants, t-shirts, shorts, blouses, suits, swimwear, lingerie, sweatshirts, jackets, dresses, skirts, gloves, bathrobes, nightgowns and socksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 21, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 5, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 5, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance