Drawing for THE FRESH TASTE OF THE GREAT NORTHWEST RAINIER ORGANIC BAKERY SINCE 1945

USPTO serial 76571026

THE FRESH TASTE OF THE GREAT NORTHWEST RAINIER ORGANIC BAKERY SINCE 1945

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194773Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
SOMERVILLE,ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with THE FRESH TASTE OF THE GREAT NORTHWEST RAINIER ORGANIC BAKERY SINCE 1945?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAX ALVAREZ

DAX ALVAREZ SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 EAST VAN BUREN STREETSUITE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Baked goods, namely, bread, [ cakes, cookies, pastries, biscuits, crackers, donuts, croutons, bagel chips, ] buns, and muffinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 10, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 10, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 1, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Jan 9, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 8, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 28, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Sep 6, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 25, 2006PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Jul 6, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 9, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 31, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 4, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 21, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 27, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 30, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004AMPXAPPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION—
Feb 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance