USPTO serial 76571193
ID IDESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325152Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ID IDESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
1940 EAST 6TH STREET, 6TH FLOORD. PETER HOCHBERG, CO., L.P.A.CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2294Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal goods, namely, metal clothing hooks, adhesive-mounted metal hooks, screw-mounted metal hooks, suction-mounted metal hooks, metal hooks, magnetic metal hooks; metal over the door hooks, metal over the door racks; metal over panel hooks and double hooks; metal panel pin on hooks; metal panel pin on clips; metal razor holder; metal knobs; metal house numbers; screw-mounted chrome hooks; and sculptures made of non-precious metal | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2004 |
| 020 | Ceramic finial hooks; non-metal double hooks; magnetic photo frames; wall mounted single hooks; self-adhesive non-metal hooks; self-adhesive non-metal triple hooks; non-metal hook holders; non-metal adhesive mounted hooks; non-metal screw mounted hooks; non-metal suction-hooks; non-metal bottle caps; non-metal bottle closure; picture frames; furniture mirrors; fog free mirrors; non-metal pegs; storage racks; wood and ceramic racks for holding and storing clothing, coats, hats, jackets, and scarves; metal corner shelves; metal racks for umbrellas; arch clips, namely, non-metal clips for holding paper and notes | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2004 |
| 021 | Soap dishes; toothbrush stands; toothbrush holders; canister sets; wastepaper baskets; toilet tissue roll reserve holders; towel holders; tissue stands; non-metal paper towel holders; non-metal paper towel holder stands; toilet brushes; self-adhesive razor holders; self-adhesive toothbrush holders; self-adhesive double toothbrush holders; bath accessories, namely, valets, valets of chrome and glass; cookbook holders; napkin holders; spoon rests; spoon stands; soap savers; sink pumps, namely, soap dispensers; dispensers for liquid soap; hand pumped flavor sprayers for food; metal racks for drying dishes; plastic drying racks; drawer organizing trays; house wares, namely, atomizers sold empty; baskets made of plastic; plastic bath racks; beverage ware; bottles sold empty; plastic coasters; coasters not of paper or table linen; bowls; soap boxes; boxes for dispensing paper towels; candle holders not of precious metal; all purpose portable containers; soap containers; containers for foods or beverages; containers for household or kitchen use; plastic cups; garbage cans; bath accessories, namely, soap holders, toothbrush holders, razor holders, shower caddies, toilet tissue holders; household utensils, namely, drain stoppers for sinks and drains; flatware holders; scrubber and sponge holders; trays for sinks; recipe boxes; broom holders; mugs; pails; salad bowls; squeegees; scrub and pad holders; compost containers for countertops, namely, containers for holding and storing composts; hanging wire baskets for straddling a double sink and wire baskets securable to sinks for draining scrubbers; towel bars; table place card holders not of precious metal; metal toilet tissue roll reserve holders; metal toilet tissue roll stands; metal toilet brushes; metal toilet tissue holders; metal soap dishes; metal wastebaskets; metal towel holders; metal towel rings; metal towel bars; metal paper towel holders; metal trivets; metal cups; chrome toilet tissue holders; ceramic toilet tissue holders; chrome finial towel rings; finial towel rings; chrome finial towel bars; ceramic finial towel bars; non-metal closures for bottles and containers for personal hygienic and cosmetic articles; plastic container closures; sink mats; sink saddles; storage racks for mugs; corner shelves for sinks for holding bathroom accessories and soap and for kitchen accessories; soap and sponge cradles; sink protection mats; drain board mats | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ID IDESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2005 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |