USPTO serial 76571289
RANGER MISSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RANGER MISSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toshima-ku, Tokyo 170-8436, JP
Toshima-ku, Tokyo 170-8436, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUESUITE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recording media having computer game program stored thereon, namely electronic circuit cards, magnetic discs, optical discs, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and magnetic tapes; recording media having video game program for business use stored thereon, namely, electronic circuit cards, magnetic discs, optical discs, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and magnetic tapes; recording media having video game program for home use stored thereon, namely, electronic circuit cards, magnetic discs, optical discs, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, and magnetic tapes; electronic game machines adapted for use with television receivers only for home use; recording media having game program for portable game machine with liquid crystal display stored thereon, namely, electronic circuit cards, magnetic discs, optical discs, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and magnetic tapes; video game programs for portable game machine with liquid crystal display; video game machines for use with televisions intended for business use; video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games; electronic circuit card, CD-ROM and DVD-ROM having automatic playing program for electronic musical instruments stored thereon; and, vending machines, electronic counters for playing computer games | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Automatic and coin-operated arcade game machines; game equipment, namely, game tables, game wheels, game cards, and game equipment for playing card games; electronic educational game machines for children other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; mobile toys; scale model vehicles; parlor games; playing cards; radio-controlled toy vehicles; hand held portable unit for playing electronic games with liquid crystal display having a function of transmitting or receiving signals; coin-operated video game machines for business use; and, hand held portable unit for playing electronic games; stand alone magnetic card-operated video game machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |