Drawing for FARMER STEVE BRAND

USPTO serial 76571392

FARMER STEVE BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARMER STEVE BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl J. Skaja

Carl J. Skaja Skaja & Daniels, LLP613 West Valley Parkway, Ste. 200Escondido, CA 92025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Produce, namely fresh orangesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 20, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jun 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance