USPTO serial 76571467
LIVEWIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVEWIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL TELEVISION, INTERACTIVE TV AND PAY-TELEVISION | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 1995 |
| 042 | SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, UPDATING, MAINTENANCE AND TESTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL TELEVISION, INTERACTIVE TELEVISION AND PAY-TELEVISION SYSTEMS, IN PARTICULAR FOR SET-TOP BOX AND HEADEND SYSTEMS; DESIGNING, DEVELOPING, TESTING AND PROFILING OF DIGITAL TELEVISION SYSTEMS, INTERACTIVE TELEVISION SYSTEMS, PAY TELEVISION SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES IN THE FIELDS OF CABLE, SATELLITE AND TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |