USPTO serial 76571568
HOMESHIELD BY AMTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMESHIELD BY AMTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | PEST AND NUISANCE WILDLIFE CONTROL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF EXCLUDING INSECTS, RODENTS, BATS AND SQUIRRELS FROM STRUCTURES BY CLOSING AND SEALING OPENINGS, USING ANY AND ALL NON-TOXIC METHODS, TO PREVENT PEST AND WILDLIFE ENTRY THROUGH THE SAME; AND PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING STEPS THAT MAY BE TAKEN BY HOMEOWNERS TO IDENTIFY, ELIMINATE, CONTROL OR PREVENT PEST AND WILDLIFE ENTRY INTO OR INFESTATION OF THE HOME OR OTHER STRUCTURES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amtech Pest and Nuisance Wildlife Control, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amtech Pest and Nuisance Wildlife Control, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named HOMESHIELD BY AMTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |