USPTO serial 76571715
SOMETHING TO SMILE ABOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOMETHING TO SMILE ABOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Staines, Middlesex, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie S. Blanchard
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | DENTIFRICES, TOOTHPASTES, ORAL CARE PREPARATIONS, TOOTH WHITENING RINSES AND ORAL CARE NONMEDICATED MOUTHWASHES, TOOTH WHITENING PREPARATIONS INCLUDING TOOTH WHITENING DENTIFRICES AND GELS, TOOTH WHITENING GUM, AND TOOTH WHITENING KITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |