Drawing for REVIVE WHITE

USPTO serial 76571719

REVIVE WHITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REVIVE WHITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie S. Blanchard

LESLIE S BLANCHARD LAW OFFICE OF LESLIE S BLANCHARD851 FRENCH MOORE, JR BLVD STE 106ABINGDON, VA 24210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003ORAL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, DENTIFRICES, TOOTHPASTES, TOOTH WHITENING RINSES AND ORAL CARE NON-MEDICATED MOUTHWASHES, TOOTH WHITENING PREPARATIONS INCLUDING TOOTH WHITENING DENTIFRICES AND GELS, TOOTH WHITENING GUM AND TOOTH WHITENING KITSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance