USPTO serial 76571728
MODEL GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3468411Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2008
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MODEL GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
Susan Neuberger Weller Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for determining performance models of human motion, namely, physical activities, skills and tasks; computer software for determining equipment fitting using performance models of individuals performing physical activities, skills and tasks related to one or more human motions; computer software for determining performance models of individuals performing physical activities, skills and tasks related to golf for evaluation, development and teaching of golf fundamentals and skills; computer software for determining equipment fitting using performance models of individuals performing physical activities, skills and tasks related to golf and user manuals sold as a unit therewith and downloadable printed materials accessed via a multi-user information network, such as the Internet, namely, printed materials, namely, books, manuals, instructional materials, press releases, newsletters, magazines, and printed promotional materials, namely, informational flyers, brochures, catalogs and advertisements, featuring information in the field of golf | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2004 |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, manuals, instructional materials, and printed promotional materials, namely, informational flyers, brochures, catalogs and advertisements featuring information in the field of golf | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2004 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats and visors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2004 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring golf-related items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2004 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, sessions, tutorials, workshops, seminars, lectures and conferences in the field of golf; and training services, namely, providing instructions in the field of golf | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ModelGolf LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ModelGolf LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ModelGolf LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MODEL GOLF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |