USPTO serial 76571752
THE SWAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SWAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Hwang
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care and beauty products, namely, facial makeup; foundations; facial powders; concealers; facial highlighters; blush; rouge; and bronzers; eye makeup; eye liners; eye shadows; eyebrow pencils; eye glitter; mascara; lipsticks; lip glosses; lip pencils; lip liners; non-medicated lip balm; cosmetic lip creams; non-medicated lip conditioner; non-medicated lip moisturizer; non-medicated lip gels; facial soap; deodorant soap; skin soaps; toilet soap; liquid soap; astringents for cosmetic purposes; depilatories; depilatory wax; creams, namely, face cream, hand cream, foot cream, body cream, eye cream, night cream, skin cleansing cream, moisturizing skin cream, vanishing cream, cold cream, depilatory cream, cuticle cream, whitening cream; facial products, namely, facial cleansers, facial toners, facial masks, facial moisturizers, facial cleansing foam, facial scrubs, facial lotions, facial scrubs, oil control lotions, non-medicated facial serums, oil absorbers, facial emulsions; skin care products, namely, skin masks, skin cleansing lotions, skin moisturizers, skin clarifiers, skin lotions, skin toner,skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin cleansers; cuticle removing preparations; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; anti-wrinkle and anti-aging preparations; creams and lotions for cellulite reduction; body lotion; body oil; body gel; body powder; cleansing lotion; cleansing gel; exfoliating products, namely, liquid scrub, exfoliating gel scrub, exfoliating cream scrub, soap and toner; moisturizing products, namely gels, lotions, tonics, and creams; nail care preparations; nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat, emery boards; hair care products; namely shampoos, conditioners, styling gels,styling lotions, hair spray, finishing spray, and styling mouse; sunblock preparations; sunscreen preparations; sun tanning preparations; pre-sun and after-sun creams, lotions and gel; perfumes; toilet waters; colognes and fragrances; eau de toilette; eau de parfum; bath care products; namely bath oils, bath powders, bubble baths, and bath gels, shower gels non-medicated bath salts; body washes; talcum powder; deodorants; antiperspirants; personal deodorants; makeup remover; eye makeup remover | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |