Drawing for TI TREASURE ISLAND

USPTO serial 76571864

TI TREASURE ISLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TI TREASURE ISLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason D. Firth

Jason D. Firth Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP100 City ParkwaySuite 1600LAS VEGAS, NV 89106

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Casino services; entertainment services, namely, live performances featuring musicians and singers, dancers, magicians, actors, acrobats, comedians and prerecorded music and videoABANDONEDMay 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 15, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 15, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 6, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 28, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 26, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance