USPTO serial 76571985
ECOSPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOSPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, FR
Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, FR
31660, Bessieres, FR
31660, Bessieres, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS INTENDED FOR TREATMENT AND PURIFICATION OF WATER FOR SWIMMING POOLS, WATERWAYS AND FOUNTAINS; WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF WATER TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR SWIMMING POOLS, WATERWAYS, FOUNTAINS AND SPAS; TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES; ENGINEERING SERVICES; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF WATER TREATMENT FOR SWIMMING POOLS, WATERWAYS, FOUNTAINS AND PREPARING REPORTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Institut Francais Du Pétrole
- Other trademarks owned by Institut Francais Du Pétrole
- Other trademarks owned by EOTEC
- Other trademarks owned by EOTEC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ECOSPA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |