Drawing for JUST AROUND THE CORNER...A MILLION MILES AWAY!

USPTO serial 76572101

JUST AROUND THE CORNER...A MILLION MILES AWAY!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUST AROUND THE CORNER...A MILLION MILES AWAY!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie P. Kramer, Christopher P. Beall, Jennifer D. Collins, Natalie Hanlon-Leh, Peter J. Kinsella, Lisa C. Walter, John L. Beard, Felicia J. Boyd, Laura G. Coates, Jodi A. DeSchane, Sandra Epp Ryan, John M. Haurykiewicz, Calvin L. Litsey, Michelle A. Pan

LESLIE P KRAMER FAEGRE & BENSON LLP3200 WELLS FARGO CTR1700 LINCOLN STDENVER, CO 80203-4532

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely jackets, t-shirts, sport shirts, button-down shirts, turtlenecks, sweatshirts, sweaters, fleece vests and fleece shirts; headwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2007MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006RGEXREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Nov 29, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 20, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2004REINREINSTATED—
May 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance