USPTO serial 76572117
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA EPP RYAN
SANDRA EPP RYAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products; namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair spray, styling spray, styling gel, styling lotion, hair gloss, hair color and permanent waves; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin creams, cleansing lotions, sunscreens, moisturizers, body gel, hand soap, personal deodorants, toothpaste, non-medicated mouth wash, face toner, eye makeup remover, spray gels, foaming bath cream, men's and women's shave gel, men's post shave, men's and women's shower gels, and facial scrubs; personal care products, namely, hand and body lotions, cleansing creams, night creams, make-up, hair coloring products, skin and hair bleaches, foot care products, namely, non-medicated foot deodorant spray, non-medicated foot powder, foot lotions, foot scrubs, foot exfoliates; sun care products, namely, sunscreen, sun block, sun tanning lotions, and after-tan lotions; spa products, namely, cleansing muds, sugar scrubs, eye cream, body butter, body milk, body polish, massage oil; body oils, exfoliates for skin; and body refresher sprays | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |