USPTO serial 76572153
GET IN. GET OUT. GET GOING.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GET IN. GET OUT. GET GOING.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID V. RADACK
DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLCUS STEEL TWRPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail convenience store services featuring convenience store items and fuel | ACTIVE | Mar 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |