USPTO serial 76572175
WHITE OAK PLANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHITE OAK PLANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
Donna J. Bunton Nixon & Vanderhye901 N. Glebe Road11th FloorArlington, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | DENIM FABRIC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |