Drawing for WHITE OAK DENIM

USPTO serial 76572176

WHITE OAK DENIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITE OAK DENIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

Donna J. Bunton Nixon & Vanderhye901 N. Glebe Road11th FloorArlington, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024DENIM FABRICACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 1, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 23, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 24, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 3, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 1, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance