USPTO serial 76572242
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis H. Cavanaugh
DENNIS H CAVANAUGH PILIERO GOLDSTEIN KAISER & MITCHELL LLP10 E 53RD ST 36TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Horological instruments, namely, wrist watches, table clocks, wall clocks, car clocks, wallet clocks, and other watches and clocks | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |