Drawing for MONTRES DE FLEUR

USPTO serial 76572242

MONTRES DE FLEUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTRES DE FLEUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis H. Cavanaugh

DENNIS H CAVANAUGH PILIERO GOLDSTEIN KAISER & MITCHELL LLP10 E 53RD ST 36TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Horological instruments, namely, wrist watches, table clocks, wall clocks, car clocks, wallet clocks, and other watches and clocksACTIVESep 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 7, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 6, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 5, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 25, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 25, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 10, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 10, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance