USPTO serial 76572251
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Duerr, Jr.
RICHARD E DUERR JR STOKES, BARTHOLOMEW, EVANS & PETREE1000 RIDGEWAY LOOP RD STE 200MEMPHIS, TN 38120UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Barware, and wine and beverage accessories, namely, foil cutters, wax cutters, wax removers, cork screws, bottle openers, funnels, strainers, pourers, bottle collars for wine bottles, ice buckets, wine buckets, thermal insulated tote bags for food or beverages, holders, bottle displays, cork displays, coolers, trivets, tongs, flasks, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, plastic coasters, wine racks, wine charms, cocktail stirrers, cocktail picks, beverage glassware, objects to hold beverage bottles, namely, insulated carrying cases with separate internal or external compartments for beverage bottles, non-insulated carrying cases with separate internal or external compartments for beverage bottles, and wine racks, bottle openers; objects to hold bottle stoppers, bottle openers, bottle closures, bottle caps and bottle corks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |