USPTO serial 76572322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Neihu, Taipei 114, TW
Neihu, Taipei 114, TW
Neihu, Taipei 114, TW
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy-Gene G. Durkin
Tracy-Gene G. Durkin Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1100 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AC induction motor drives; servo motors; servo motor drives; DC brushless motors; DC brushless motor drives; DC brushless spindle motors and steppers; DC motor blowers; variable speed AC motor drives and AC motor drives, AC fans for household electronic appliances and machine motors, where none of the aforementioned goods is adapted for use in woodworking, metalworking or construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Programmable temperature controllers, electronic servo motor controllers; optical encoders; programmable logic controllers, frequency inverters; [ human machine interface devices, namely, ] touch screens, touch pads, [ computer keyboards, and microphones; ] operation interface computer terminals; fan and tray module, namely, a DC fan used in computer, server and networking systems; optical sensors for light and capacity; optical switches; rack power systems for communication comprised of uninterruptible power supplies and switching power supplies; switching power supplies; uninterruptible power supplies; DC-DC converters; switch mode rectifiers; broad mount power supplies; control and supervisory units for telecom power systems, control and supervisory systems comprised of electronic controller for electronic circuits; battery chargers; monitors, namely, TV monitors, LCD monitors, computer monitors, and color video monitors; battery control and supervisory units, namely, devices acting as the user interface to monitor and control telecom power systems; power distribution blocks, namely, AC distribution unit blocks and DC distribution unit blocks; AC/DC adapters; DC/AC inverters; electronic ballast; oscillators; DC-DC converters; components and equipment for computer networking of magnetic transformers, namely, computer hardware, Ethernet of Token Ring Network filters, DC filters, common mode chokes, transformers, integrated connector module; radio frequency microwave components and modules, namely, voltage controlled oscillators; chip conductors; high frequency electro-magnetic interference common mode chokes; fiber optical transceiver modules; EMI/RFI filters; [ fiber optical passive components and optical components, namely, ] splitters, filters, capacitors, transformers and inductors; radio frequency microwave amplifiers; computer hardware and operating software, namely, high dot-per-inch liquid crystal display monitors; DSL splitters; [ LCD TV; PDP TV; ] LCD monitors; [ CRT monitors; PDP monitors; ] LCD projectors; digital imaging projectors, picture projectors featuring mirror technology; CPU coolers; DC fan for computers, electronics and communication apparatus; crossflow fans for computer and servers; electrical fan controller; electronic fan controller; AC fans for computer rack, network system rack, telecommunication system and its rack, data storage system and its rack, and data storage library of tertiary storage; electric coils; magnetic and electromagnetic coils, where none of the aforementioned goods is adapted for use in woodworking, metalworking or construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Cold cathode fluorescent lamps; AC fans for household or office ventilation or air conditioning circulation, where none of the aforementioned goods is adapted for use in woodworking, metalworking or construction | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |