USPTO serial 76572349
TEAM FUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEAM FUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 6E1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennie Sue Malloy
JENNIE SUE MALLOY MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVEHISTORIC CORAL WAYMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamin enriched beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Wearing apparel for men and women, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, shirts of all kinds; sweat pants, sweat suits, track suits, shorts, sweaters, pants, coats, jackets, gloves, wristbands, leg warmers, ties, belts; suspenders; headwear, namely, hats, caps, visors, ear muffs, and headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Soccer balls; hockey sticks; baseball bats; footballs; volleyballs; handballs; tennis rackets; tennis balls; playing cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, namely, fruit juices, fruit drinks, vegetable juices, vegetable drinks, soy-based drinks not a milk substitute, soft drinks, waters, soda water, aerated waters, mineral waters, carbonated drinking waters, flavored waters, unflavored drinking water, table waters, sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1590520 Ontario Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TEAM FUEL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |